The size of the new databases managed to get you’ll to attract user products linked to gender, years and residence

I plus wished to observe risk-providing dimensions was in fact related to works functions thereby questioned the brand new players in our study to indicate as to the the quantity what they do could well be classified since the varied, risky and you can/otherwise intense. The root theory is that an over-all readiness to take chances would be shown into the assortment of really works (Discover Zuckerman 2007 ).

Tries and secret variables

The central aim within data were to top learn mans standard attitudes with the exposure-delivering, the way they are influenced by socio-market background and you can identity and exactly how they are conveyed in more specific exposure-delivering perceptions and you will practices.

Blogged on the internet:

Q1. Exactly how will be the answers distributed on every of exposure dimensions? The hypothesis right here was you to definitely (H1) folks are typically risk averse as well as the delivery regarding responses could well be skewed with the chance averse area of the measure.

Q2. What is the family members between the exposure size and you will market details? Centered on prior to browse i questioned that (H2) guys was way more prepared to need dangers than simply women and you may younger a lot more willing than just older people. We had zero specific hypotheses regarding the almost every other socio-group parameters.

Q3. What’s the loved ones amongst the risk-providing size and you can personality? Considering intuitions and additionally prior to browse i questioned while the our theory (H3) that chance-providing perceptions might be definitely synchronised that have a great) Feelings Seeking and its own subscales, having b) Extraversion and you will Psychoticism of one’s EPQ size and you may c) having Extraversion and you may Visibility to help you this new experiences towards Large Five measure.

Q4. What is the relation within chance proportions and you may work characteristics? I expected right here one (H4) risk-taking attitudes would-be positively correlated with variety of really works you to definitely are ranged, risky and you will/otherwise bodily.

Q5. What is the relation within chance proportions and you may readiness to be involved in unsafe things? We asked one to (H5) risk-providing thinking could well be absolutely associated with willingness are productive from inside the risky recreation, risky operate and risky military surgery.

Q6. What are the most critical predictors away from exposure-getting? We requested right here (H6) your hypothesized character traits and additionally sex and you may ages are definitely the primary predictors.

Thing and techniques

Data have been built-up because of the Ipsos Look Institute, a worldwide team which have ISO9001 and ISO 202252 permits. Investigation have been compiled throughout a month or more from inside the . The respondents was in fact employed on company’s very own databases, that contains every registered cell phone numbers inside Norway, along with mobile phones. Number was indeed chosen into a lotto basis together with interviewers expected into member of your family, regarding 15 years otherwise a lot more than, whose birthday try next. To-arrive step one,000 over interview 22,355 everyone was contacted that have a maximum of 61,916 phone calls. Of these contacted nine,567 responded and you can twelve,788 didn’t. A total of step 1,100 participants then done the telephone interview, and this endured as much as you are times. New impulse price of the individuals called is actually four % and you will away from people that replied 10 %. Although the impulse prices should optimally was basically highest, a closer inspection discovered that the newest decide to try met standards for representativity on selected variables. The last attempt examine the site scored well. Many years try collected in many years. For a long time 15–twenty four years new try reached 82% of one’s people objective, 25–39 years 109%, 40–forty two years 90%, 50–59 age 112%, 60–69 many years 110%, as well as 70 + decades 94%. As the shot obtained really towards the age and other records parameters, we could possibly underline that our utilization of the expression ‘the fresh population’ or ‘the new Norwegian population’ on the blog post need to be pulled with warning as a result of the representativity matter.

error: Le contenu est protégé